on 16 May 2018)
The 70-200 f/2.8 is a photographer's workhorse lens, the telephoto end of
the "holy trinity" of fast zooms*. It is an incredibly versatile lens
because it lets you get pictures of things that are far away, or to take
portraits where the background just melts away into a silky blur. I had a
lot of photographers tell me that this is the single most important lens in
a pro's bag, and I didn't really understand it until I shot with one.
And they're right, of course, which is why they're pros. Nothing I can say will really explain it, you just have to try one to really understand.
Now, in spite of that, I don't own one yet. (Hindsight: at least I didn't when this was published....) I've been renting them when necessary because, from a purely business standpoint, buying one outright hasn't made financial sense yet. I've also been renting different versions so that I can get a feel for which one I'd like to eventually buy. To date I've tried out the following:
Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VRII
Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 FL
Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 G2
Nikon 70-200 f/4 (I know it's not an f/2.8, but I'm a sucker for lightweight lenses)
I'm not going to spend a lot of time doing detailed comparisons of optical performance other than to say that they are all very good because far more qualified folks than I have done that to death (plus, I never had all of them at the same time to do a real side-by-side). But I do want to share a few things that I learned about them.
|The Nikon VRII and the lighter Nikon f/4.|
The first thing you notice when handling a 70-200 f/2.8 is the size and
weight of them. They are generally built like tanks and would likely serve
just as well as a blunt weapon as a photographic tool**. This is part of
why pros love these lenses: they're reliable. The f/4 isn't nearly as
ruggedly built and is much lighter. This is great if weight is
at a premium for you and I could see using one if I were hiking, climbing,
etc., but out on a bouncing chaseboat, I always had a mild fear of
breaking it in the back of my mind. I never had this fear with any of the
f/2.8s. For this reason alone, the f/4 is generally not suited for my
needs, even though it is a great performer optically and in other
The zoom rings on all of the Nikon lenses have a very consistent feel to
them: light enough to zoom easily, but not so light as to shift focal
length should you take your hand off of the ring. The zoom ring on the
Tamron lens, on the other hand, is stiffer and takes a bit more effort to
turn. None of them feel bad to me and I suspect that liking one or the
other will boil down to personal preference. For me, shooting the Tamron
on land feels better because it seems more precise, but the Nikons feel
better on the water because I'm already expending so much more energy
just to steady myself that every little bit of reduced effort helps. I
suspect that the zoom ring on the Tamron will loosen up over time as zoom
rings are prone to do, but ideally I'd like it to be a bit looser
The Ring of Power
Speaking of zoom rings, not all of them are located in the same place. On
Nikon's VRII and f/4, the zoom ring is located closer to the camera, and
on Nikon's FL and Tamron's G2, the zoom ring is closer to the front
element. Two of these arrangements feel quite natural and balanced nicely,
the other two not so much.
The f/4 is just about perfectly balanced for a smaller body like the D7200 I used it with. It doesn't have a lot of weight out front, so keeping your grip closer to the body keeps the whole camera well balanced. Likewise, the Tamron G2 is also very well balanced for a smaller body; with more weight from the heavier lens out front, moving your hand further forward on the lens keeps the weight distribution right. Also, and very importantly, the focus ring on the Tamron is placed such that your hand doesn't tend to rest on it (at least not my hands), so having my hand that far forward doesn't interfere with the focus.
Nikon FL as deployed
The VRII feels very front-heavy with a smaller body. I suspect that it's definitely designed with a heavier body in mind. This poor balance seemed to wear my arms out faster while shooting, which was an issue being on a boat all day. Nikon changed this with the newer FL model, possibly in anticipation of lighter mirrorless bodies in the future. But in doing so they placed the focus ring right where the palm of my hand seems to naturally rest, meaning that I had to come up with a creative solution (which I describe below) to avoid throwing my focus off. This awkward placement of the focus ring really hits the FL in the ergonomics department despite the better overall balance with a smaller body.
Feet of Strength
With the VRII, my preferred method of deployment is simply to remove the tripod foot from its collar and attach my cross-body sling to the tripod mount that remains in the collar. This makes for a very slim setup and balances well while by my side, and it doesn't get in my way while shooting. Nikon really got the tripod collar right on the VRII and FL; I wish someone would come up with a similar version for the Tamron or other lenses.
I deployed differently on the FL because of the focus ring issue. I
settled on leaving the foot attached, but rotating the foot to the left so
that it covered the switches and attaching my sling to it. This had the
benefit of protecting the switches from being accidentally flipped (which
isn't a big deal for Nikon lenses, those switches are pretty stiff), but
more importantly it allowed me to rest the palm of my hand on the tripod
foot instead of the focus ring. Viola! No more focus ring issues. The
downsides to this are a slightly clunkier rig and a bit more fatigue for
my left hand from arching my palm slightly. Mind you, this works with my
hands, if you have smaller hands it may not. (Then again, if you have
smaller hands, the focus ring placement may not be an issue for you in the
first place, so....)
A similar setup (tripod foot left attached and rotated over the switches) works wonderfully for the Tamron G2 as well, but for a different reason. The switches on the Tamron lens are a bit looser and more susceptible to accidental switching, so having that tripod foot guard them works quite well. Also, the geometry of this setup feels much more natural on the G2, so it didn't tire out my hand like it did on the FL. (Again, your hands may vary.)
Although the Tamron lacks the cool removable tripod foot of the Nikons, it does have an Arca Swiss mount built into it's tripod foot, so it's easier to actually attach to a tripod. (The whole collar is also removable, but the lens seems rather awkward without it on.) I feel like an ideal tripod mount for a 70-200 would combine the easily detachable foot and permanent collar with a secondary mount of the Nikons with the built-in Arca Swiss mount on the foot itself of the Tamron.
The f/4 has an optional tripod collar, but I suspect that using it would be largely a waste. The lens is so light that the camera body's tripod attachment point should works just fine for a cross-body sling and should work equally well for tripods.
Hippy Hippy Shake
|Tamron G2, as deployed, just like the FL.|
Image stabilization is important for telephoto lenses if you're not
shooting with a tripod. I didn't do detailed measurements of the
performance of the different lenses, but I will say that they all allowed
me to make sharp, hand-held shots that would have been impossible
otherwise. One distinct observation that I do have though is the general
feel of the various image stabilization systems and how they look through
The Nikon systems tend to jump around more as I'm composing a shot. This has no impact on the final image as it still freezes the frame when the shutter is released, but it does sometimes make composition trickier. Also, if I were to shoot video (which I rarely do, at least through lenses like these), I imagine the video would likewise be jumpy. Nikon seemed to design their system with minimizing power use and instantaneous, instead of continuous, performance in mind, which makes perfect sense for a still camera.
On the other hand, the Tamron system held the image much more smoothly over time. When looking through the viewfinder I had an easier time composing shots, and I imagine that video shot through the Tamron lens would be smoother as well. In terms of overall usability, I definitely prefer the image stabilization of the Tamron lens.
One potentially related observation here is that my camera's battery seemed to drain a bit faster with the Tamron G2. Maybe that extra smoothness in the image stabilization came at the expense of increased power draw? This would make sense because it seemed like the Tamron's image stabilization system was running running harder/longer than on the Nikons. Or maybe my batteries are just getting old. Again, I haven't gotten to do a side-by-side test, but I wanted to mention it anyways.
The Almighty Dollar
The difference in price between these lenses is wholly non-trivial. The
Nikon f/4 and the Tamron G2 are both about $1,400 when bought new. The
Nikon VRII was last available at $2,100 new but isn't in production
anymore, and sells used for about $1,400.
The Nikon FL sells new for a whopping $2,800. I could buy two of the other lenses and have one as a backup for the price of a single Nikon FL!
Price-wise, the VRII felt about right to me when you could still get it new. Paying a premium for the factory warranty and Nikon reliability would have been worth the extra money. I'm not opposed to buying refurbished or used (in fact, most of my gear is refurbished), but for a major investment like this I'd rather buy new for the factory warranty. This means I probably won't be buying a VRII.
I cannot see myself being able to justify a $2,800 pricetag for any piece of equipment anytime soon, even to get that warranty and legendary Nikon durability. I simply don't make enough money with my photography yet to justify such an expense. Sorry Nikon, you priced yourself right out of my market with that one. I'm sure that full-time pros will still buy it, but for side-gig photographers like me, it just doesn't make financial sense.
As I mentioned above, the Nikon f/4 isn't rugged enough for my needs, so that's a no-go as well in spite of it's comparatively low pricetag and great optical performance.
That leaves me with the Tamron G2. It's rugged, it's ergonomics are right, it's image stabilization is top notch, it's price is reasonable, it's still available with a full warranty, and it produces great images. I think this puts the Tamron G2 into a sweet spot in terms of value and performance for me as a part-timer. I have some reservations about its long-term reliability since it is coming from a third party manufacturer, but the lower cost and 6 year warranty help balance those reservations out. Once I get my income stream a bit more solid, I'll almost certainly be buying one.
*The other two being the normal zoom and the wide zoom in f/2.8. Most current normal fast zooms are 24-70, and the wides vary by manufacturer, but Nikon's is 14-24.
**I do not, under any circumstances, recommend or condone the use of expensive photographic equipment as a blunt weapon. Or, for that matter, beating people with blunt weapons in general.
***I cannot quite emphasize how tricky it is to take a picture of yourself holding a camera with a heavy lens, one handed, with a second camera, also one-handed. Heh.
In Hindsight - Updates from the future
I ended up buying the Tamron G2 model not long after I originally published this. I can safely say that after a few years of shooting, including a pair of weddings, a few handful of regattas, several times underway on US Navy warships, and a fair number of portrait sessions, that the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 G2 is an absolutely solid lens and was a fantastic choice for a photographer in my position. Every so often I see the FL on sale or refurbished for a far more reasonable price and feel a tinge of FOMO...but if I had waited I would have missed out on almost three years of great photography. Maybe one day, but not any time soon.
Also, although I did all of my testing on my trusty crop sensor D7200, it still performs amazingly well on my full frame D750.